Pedestals supporting bridge bearings are subjected to large concentrated loads. When the projection of the pedestal is relatively small compared to its effective depth, the pedestal is designed as a reinforced concrete corbel rather than a cantilever beam.
This article presents a complete numerical example for the design of an RCC pedestal as a corbel.
Problem Statement
Design an RCC pedestal supporting a bridge bearing using the following data.
Pedestal Dimensions
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Length (L) | 1000 mm |
| Width (W) | 1000 mm |
| Height | 470 mm |
Design Data
Geometry
Depth of corbel,
h = 1.00 m
Cover,
Cover = 50 mm
Effective depth,
Therefore,
d = 950 mm
Width,
b =1000;mm
Shear span,
a =420;mm
Cantilever length,
Lc =470;mm
Material Properties
Concrete
Steel
Design Loads
Ultimate shear force,
Horizontal force,
Step 1 – Check Whether Member is a Corbel
Code requirement
Calculation
Since
Therefore,
Hence,
The pedestal qualifies to be designed as a corbel.
Step 2 – Horizontal Load Requirement
According to corbel design provisions,
Calculation
Given,
Hence,
Requirement is satisfied.
Step 3 – Effective Ledge Section
Effective area
or
Nominal Shear Capacity
From the design sheet,
Design shear strength
Applied shear
Check
Hence,
Safe in shear transfer.
Step 4 – Shear Friction Reinforcement
For monolithic concrete,
Coefficient of friction,
Concrete factor,
Required reinforcement,
From calculation,
Step 5 – Direct Tension Reinforcement
Direct tension steel,
Substituting,
Step 6 – Flexural Reinforcement
Ultimate bending moment,
Substituting,
Required flexural steel,
Step 7 – Primary Tension Reinforcement
Option 1
Option 2
Minimum Reinforcement
Minimum steel,
From calculation,
Therefore,
Hence,
Required main steel
Step 8 – Shear Reinforcement
Required shear reinforcement,
Step 9 – Main Reinforcement Provided
Provide
8 Nos. 25 mm diameter bars
Area of one 25 mm bar,
Total steel,
Provided
Required
Hence,
Safe
Step 10 – Shear Reinforcement Provided
Provide
4-legged 12 mm stirrups
Area of one 12 mm bar,
Total provided according to spacing,
Required
Therefore,
Safe.
Final Reinforcement
| Item | Provided | Required | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Reinforcement | 8–25 mm bars | 30.4 cm² | ✔ OK |
| Steel Area | 39.25 cm² | 30.4 cm² | ✔ OK |
| Shear Reinforcement | 4-leg 12 mm stirrups | 13.7 cm² | ✔ OK |
| Shear Steel Area | 18.09 cm² | 13.7 cm² | ✔ OK |
Final Conclusion
The pedestal satisfies all the design requirements for a reinforced concrete corbel:
- Corbel geometry check: ✔ a<0.95d
- Horizontal force check: ✔ Nu≥0.2Vu
- Shear transfer capacity: ✔ Safe
- Flexural reinforcement: ✔ Adequate
- Primary tension reinforcement: ✔ Adequate
- Main reinforcement provided: ✔ 39.25 cm² > 30.4 cm²
- Shear reinforcement provided: ✔ 18.09 cm² > 13.7 cm²
Hence, the RCC pedestal is safe and satisfactory for the applied loading conditions.

Dibyendu Singha is a Civil Engineer with expertise in bridge design, structural engineering, and infrastructure projects. He shares insights on engineering, construction practices, technology, and professional development.