Contents
- 1 Problem Statement
- 2 Design Data
- 3 Material Properties
- 4 Design Loads
- 5 Step 1 – Check Whether Member is a Corbel
- 6 Step 2 – Horizontal Load Requirement
- 7 Step 3 – Effective Ledge Section
- 8 Step 4 – Shear Friction Reinforcement
- 9 Step 5 – Direct Tension Reinforcement
- 10 Step 6 – Flexural Reinforcement
- 11 Step 7 – Primary Tension Reinforcement
- 12 Step 8 – Shear Reinforcement
- 13 Step 9 – Main Reinforcement Provided
- 14 Step 10 – Shear Reinforcement Provided
- 15 Final Reinforcement
- 16 Final Conclusion
Pedestals supporting bridge bearings are subjected to large concentrated loads. When the projection of the pedestal is relatively small compared to its effective depth, the pedestal is designed as a reinforced concrete corbel rather than a cantilever beam.
This article presents a complete numerical example for the design of an RCC pedestal as a corbel.
Problem Statement
Design an RCC pedestal supporting a bridge bearing using the following data.
Pedestal Dimensions
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Length (L) | 1000 mm |
| Width (W) | 1000 mm |
| Height | 470 mm |
Design Data
Geometry
Depth of corbel,
h = 1.00 m
Cover,
Cover = 50 mm
Effective depth,
Therefore,
d = 950 mm
Width,
b =1000;mm
Shear span,
a =420;mm
Cantilever length,
Lc =470;mm
Material Properties
Concrete
Steel
Design Loads
Ultimate shear force,
Horizontal force,
Step 1 – Check Whether Member is a Corbel
Code requirement
Calculation
Since
Therefore,
Hence,
The pedestal qualifies to be designed as a corbel.
Step 2 – Horizontal Load Requirement
According to corbel design provisions,
Calculation
Given,
Hence,
Requirement is satisfied.
Step 3 – Effective Ledge Section
Effective area
or
Nominal Shear Capacity
From the design sheet,
Design shear strength
Applied shear
Check
Hence,
Safe in shear transfer.
Step 4 – Shear Friction Reinforcement
For monolithic concrete,
Coefficient of friction,
Concrete factor,
Required reinforcement,
From calculation,
Step 5 – Direct Tension Reinforcement
Direct tension steel,
Substituting,
Step 6 – Flexural Reinforcement
Ultimate bending moment,
Substituting,
Required flexural steel,
Step 7 – Primary Tension Reinforcement
Option 1
Option 2
Minimum Reinforcement
Minimum steel,
From calculation,
Therefore,
Hence,
Required main steel
Step 8 – Shear Reinforcement
Required shear reinforcement,
Step 9 – Main Reinforcement Provided
Provide
8 Nos. 25 mm diameter bars
Area of one 25 mm bar,
Total steel,
Provided
Required
Hence,
Safe
Step 10 – Shear Reinforcement Provided
Provide
4-legged 12 mm stirrups
Area of one 12 mm bar,
Total provided according to spacing,
Required
Therefore,
Safe.
Final Reinforcement
| Item | Provided | Required | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Reinforcement | 8–25 mm bars | 30.4 cm² | ✔ OK |
| Steel Area | 39.25 cm² | 30.4 cm² | ✔ OK |
| Shear Reinforcement | 4-leg 12 mm stirrups | 13.7 cm² | ✔ OK |
| Shear Steel Area | 18.09 cm² | 13.7 cm² | ✔ OK |
Final Conclusion
The pedestal satisfies all the design requirements for a reinforced concrete corbel:
- Corbel geometry check: ✔ a<0.95d
- Horizontal force check: ✔ Nu≥0.2Vu
- Shear transfer capacity: ✔ Safe
- Flexural reinforcement: ✔ Adequate
- Primary tension reinforcement: ✔ Adequate
- Main reinforcement provided: ✔ 39.25 cm² > 30.4 cm²
- Shear reinforcement provided: ✔ 18.09 cm² > 13.7 cm²
Hence, the RCC pedestal is safe and satisfactory for the applied loading conditions.

Dibyendu Singha is a Civil Engineer with expertise in bridge design, structural engineering, and infrastructure projects. He shares insights on engineering, construction practices, technology, and professional development.